Golden Hour. From "Mixed Reality" series
Artists | |
---|---|
Year | 2018 |
Material | Bromoil mounted on canvas |
Size | 104 × 170 cm |
Edition | 1/15 |
Throughout his life, a person "lives" (accumulates) a certain experience, which, having passed through the contextual filters of the mind, is subjectively recorded in memory. The camera and lens simply refract the light and fix it on the image plane. The human eye, on the contrary, transmits light energy to the brain, where it is processed, converted into an electrical signal, connects with sound, smell, taste and touch, connects in our brain with the corresponding experiences, and sometimes even distorted.
With humor, irony and, to some extent, metaphysical mischief, Grigory Mayofis in his project "Mixed Reality" explores the inextricable link between photographic vision and human perception. In a series of narratives, on which he continues to work, Mayofis introduces us to characters involved in a strange game: they perform actions that should have a deeply sensual nature, but their feelings are complemented by augmented reality glasses, and we observe the discord and absurdity of what is happening. As we do not know the personalities of the characters in the pictures, so the essence and purpose of the game or the games revealed to us remain unexplained.
Augmented reality itself can be seen as an attempt to overcome the limitations inherent in photography. For almost two centuries, since the invention of photography, numerous attempts have been made to bridge the gap between mechanical and human vision.
The photos taken by Mayofis are inherently paradoxical. These are ordinary staged photographs of the latest photographic technologies, but they are an artful deception that covers another, deeper one. Mayophis shows us not only the observer and the observed, he forces us (as observers) to stand face to face with the observed and contemplate what they observe. The meaning in these photos is multilevel, the "reality" is elusive. — Where is the truth? In the blinkered reality of a character with an augmented reality headset, or in the bodily reality that we, the audience, perceive? If you dig deeper, the question arises about what the photos of Mayofis themselves are: are they a literal observation or a metaphorical construction? His works encourage us to transfer our own experience of observers and witnesses to the experience of the characters.
Philip Prodger, Doctor, Senior Researcher, Yale University Center for British Art, USA